One for Shell V-power petrol users.
-
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 9:17 pm
This guy is an Engineer that fettles Aston Martins. Not some hick Yank YouTube 'Star' so I'd take what he says as correct.
Dolomite Silver 'S' with red leather 14 way seats, Pano roof, Bose, Air suspension with pasm, Chrono pack, PDLS, Surround view, 911 turbo wheels, heated screen, spare wheel, ioniser,75 lt tank, black tail pipes, black roof rails.
Food for thought when I collect my GTS.
Peter
Current: 2020 Carmine Red GTS http://www.porsche-code.com/PMST9ZI9
Gone- 2015 Sapphire Blue Diesel
Gone -2013 Cayenne Diesel
Current: 2020 Carmine Red GTS http://www.porsche-code.com/PMST9ZI9
Gone- 2015 Sapphire Blue Diesel
Gone -2013 Cayenne Diesel
On the 911UK website there is a thread discussing Esso Synergy vs Shell V Power. Below is an interesting comment from this on the octane rating for Esso Synergy:
"The 97 thing is a bit of a misnomer, a contact of mine is one of Esso's engine dyno fuel testers. The fuel is typically 100, or 99 octane. He told me exactly how the advertised octane rating arrived at 97, a very long story but entirely true. In a nutshell, the fuel was tested at individual garages all over the country over a period of one year. One sample and one sample alone, tested 97. That pump had never sold a single litre, the fuel was 9 months old....
We see more horsepower on this fuel than any other when testing various engines on our in house engine dyno. It's good stuff."
Make of that what you will?
"The 97 thing is a bit of a misnomer, a contact of mine is one of Esso's engine dyno fuel testers. The fuel is typically 100, or 99 octane. He told me exactly how the advertised octane rating arrived at 97, a very long story but entirely true. In a nutshell, the fuel was tested at individual garages all over the country over a period of one year. One sample and one sample alone, tested 97. That pump had never sold a single litre, the fuel was 9 months old....
We see more horsepower on this fuel than any other when testing various engines on our in house engine dyno. It's good stuff."
Make of that what you will?
Nige
2016: Boxster 981 GTS in GT Silver
2020: Macan GTS in Crayon
On order: GTS http://www.porsche-code.com/PR9P7VG9
2016: Boxster 981 GTS in GT Silver
2020: Macan GTS in Crayon
On order: GTS http://www.porsche-code.com/PR9P7VG9
Really useful info. Thank you.
I've been using Shell Vpower for my GTS and on previous cars thinking it was the best fuel. Should I and my fellow Macan driver be switching to Esso in light of this highly informative content?
I've been using Shell Vpower for my GTS and on previous cars thinking it was the best fuel. Should I and my fellow Macan driver be switching to Esso in light of this highly informative content?
Macan GTS Mark 1 - bought new 2017 and sold 2024
Macan GTS Mark 3 - bought new 2024
Macan GTS Mark 3 - bought new 2024
I'm now asking myself that same question - Shell V-Power and its additives vs. Esso's Synergy and its 100 Octane, bio-ethanol-free fuel ?
I am certainly going to try a tank full of Synergy next time I am low.
in addition, I do travel to some rural areas of the country where stations getting very few like Mid wales (if allowed back if they ever accept tourism again!), have a north of Scotland trip planned next year and another brand on my acceptable list could be handy
2019 Macan S Porsche code PKW8WKI8
-
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 9:17 pm
Maybe this is why Ferrari have been rubbish for some years using V-power!
Dolomite Silver 'S' with red leather 14 way seats, Pano roof, Bose, Air suspension with pasm, Chrono pack, PDLS, Surround view, 911 turbo wheels, heated screen, spare wheel, ioniser,75 lt tank, black tail pipes, black roof rails.
Tesco Momentum is Esso supplied and 99 octane rating, so I assume this is the same and it’s what we have put int both of our cars since new. I am not sure if I notice a performance difference, but at an 8p/l premium I have seen almost equivalent increase in fuel consumption and increased range as a rule.
As to Ethanol impact I have never really thought about it, yes it’s a shorter hydrocarbon so will have a lower output, but I am not sure that would be noticeable and the video highlight Astons cant compensate, which I assume the Audi/Porsche engine can. I also assume this is at red line. Not something that worries me if I get 1 or 2 HP drop at max rpm, I still have 350+ left
As to Ethanol impact I have never really thought about it, yes it’s a shorter hydrocarbon so will have a lower output, but I am not sure that would be noticeable and the video highlight Astons cant compensate, which I assume the Audi/Porsche engine can. I also assume this is at red line. Not something that worries me if I get 1 or 2 HP drop at max rpm, I still have 350+ left
Arrived March 2020 - Sapphire 2020 GTS (PL17PEQ3)
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 24 Replies
- 1550 Views
-
Last post by Kleynie
-
- 9 Replies
- 1213 Views
-
Last post by Plyphon
-
- 37 Replies
- 3736 Views
-
Last post by TheTraveller
-
- 11 Replies
- 1109 Views
-
Last post by JBA
-
- 16 Replies
- 3303 Views
-
Last post by Plyphon