Correction - you mean downgrade!
2019 Macan S - fuel consumption
- Nuclear Nick
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:42 pm
- Location: Bristol
Nick
Defender 90 V8
991.2 C2 GTS
Macan Turbo - sold
BMW K1300S, BMW R1250 GSA
Defender 90 V8
991.2 C2 GTS
Macan Turbo - sold
BMW K1300S, BMW R1250 GSA
- Wing Commander
- Posts: 19871
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
+1.
Simon
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
-
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 12:33 pm
- Location: Warrenpoint, N Ireland
In the last few days WLTP figures for the facelift Macan S have appeared on the Porsche website and show in a configuration when you save it.
Fuel consumption (WLTP)
Fuel consumption low 15.6 l/100 km
Fuel consumption medium 11.0 l/100 km
Fuel consumption high 9.8 l/100 km
Fuel consumption extra-high 11.2 l/100 km
Fuel consumption combined 11.3 l/100 km
Fuel consumption combined* (model range) 23.9 - 25.7 mpg
Fuel consumption low 18.1 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption medium 25.7 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption high 28.8 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption extra-high 25.2 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption combined 25.0 mpg (UK)
I understand low approximates to city, medium to urban, high to a road and extra high to motorway. I suspect as European figures, the motorway speed is above the legal Uk max as the WLTP test specs say top speed achieved about 82 mph
It would definitely help feel and understanding if they abandoned the terms low . medium, high and extra high.
Fuel consumption (WLTP)
Fuel consumption low 15.6 l/100 km
Fuel consumption medium 11.0 l/100 km
Fuel consumption high 9.8 l/100 km
Fuel consumption extra-high 11.2 l/100 km
Fuel consumption combined 11.3 l/100 km
Fuel consumption combined* (model range) 23.9 - 25.7 mpg
Fuel consumption low 18.1 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption medium 25.7 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption high 28.8 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption extra-high 25.2 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption combined 25.0 mpg (UK)
I understand low approximates to city, medium to urban, high to a road and extra high to motorway. I suspect as European figures, the motorway speed is above the legal Uk max as the WLTP test specs say top speed achieved about 82 mph
It would definitely help feel and understanding if they abandoned the terms low . medium, high and extra high.
Last edited by pmg on Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2019 Macan S Porsche code PKW8WKI8
Porsche is quoting combined mpgs of:
25.7 – 28.2 for 2L Macan
23.9 – 25.7 for 3L Macan S
Quite interesting how there's not much difference between the 2L Macan and 3L Macan S. Especially if the 2L Macan is being touted as a comparatively fuel efficient model. For me, there would need to be a significant difference to even consider a 2L Macan over a 3L, especially given the small price difference.
It even looks like a heavily specced base 2L has the same mpg as a lightly specced 3L.
25.7 – 28.2 for 2L Macan
23.9 – 25.7 for 3L Macan S
Quite interesting how there's not much difference between the 2L Macan and 3L Macan S. Especially if the 2L Macan is being touted as a comparatively fuel efficient model. For me, there would need to be a significant difference to even consider a 2L Macan over a 3L, especially given the small price difference.
It even looks like a heavily specced base 2L has the same mpg as a lightly specced 3L.
Current - Macan III GTS
Previous - Macan II GTS, Macan I GTS
Previous - Macan II GTS, Macan I GTS
A bit cheaper to purchase, a tiny bit more fuel economy, slightly smaller first year tax, and a little less on insurance. I'm going crazy - commenting on my own posts!
Current - Macan III GTS
Previous - Macan II GTS, Macan I GTS
Previous - Macan II GTS, Macan I GTS
the comparison is clearer if you look at the more detailed figures/splitsPaulR wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:30 pm Porsche is quoting combined mpgs of:
25.7 – 28.2 for 2L Macan
23.9 – 25.7 for 3L Macan S
Quite interesting how there's not much difference between the 2L Macan and 3L Macan S. Especially if the 2L Macan is being touted as a comparatively fuel efficient model. For me, there would need to be a significant difference to even consider a 2L Macan over a 3L, especially given the small price difference.
It even looks like a heavily specced base 2L has the same mpg as a lightly specced 3L.
2L
Fuel consumption low 21.7 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption medium 28.8 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption high 32.5 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption extra-high 25.9 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption combined 27.4 mpg (UK)
S
Fuel consumption low 18.1 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption medium 25.7 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption high 28.8 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption extra-high 25.2 mpg (UK)
Fuel consumption combined 25.0 mpg (UK)
So typically 2L only 2 to 3 mpg better except on the motorway where little difference. confirms my feeling the 2l is for partners as a 2nd car who want a sporty prestige SUV for the school and supermarket run. some may argue lighter front end means better handling
2019 Macan S Porsche code PKW8WKI8
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 19 Replies
- 3325 Views
-
Last post by andywebber
-
- 64 Replies
- 7593 Views
-
Last post by Semerka
-
- 12 Replies
- 4460 Views
-
Last post by GTB
-
- 9 Replies
- 2446 Views
-
Last post by timthetinyhorse
-
- 2 Replies
- 2090 Views
-
Last post by Madelvic