The best bit about Fuely is the Viz-style "top tips" section for saving fuel. Ranges from comedic to just stupid
http://www.fuelly.com/tips (you don't need to sign up)
2019 Macan S - fuel consumption
My S does around 23mpg on average, with a mix of urban and dual carriageway cruising.
Macan S collected 4 Dec 2017 - Jet Black, 20" SportDesign, Agate/Pebble, 18-way, Pano roof, Bi-Xenons with PDLS, Surround View, PASM, PS+, spare wheel, towbar.
2021 Audi TT Roadster Black Edition (hers)
2011 Freelander 2 (workhorse)
2021 Audi TT Roadster Black Edition (hers)
2011 Freelander 2 (workhorse)
OK (and is that indicated or true?), but I was really interested in any pointers for the new one, which - it would be nice to think - might be at least 2-3mpg (maybe a little bit more?) more economical than the old one. I guess it's perhaps too early for anyone to have much hands-on experience (have any even been delivered yet?) but someone here might have some insights into potential mpg.
Problem is that distance is still measured in miles (and right now is probably not the best time to change that for better conformity with Europe). So the only logical option would be to invent yet another measure, eg litres/100 miles. Simplest just to stick with what everyone knows and loves and instinctively understands, ie mpg.
- Wing Commander
- Posts: 19922
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
Can’t speak for the new Macan 3.0 engine, but I do have a Porsche with a different 3.0 engine. I generally get an indicated 29-30mpg, so I’d be disappointed if you didn’t get that from a facelift Macan S. 25+ mpg in the real world should be eminently achievable, in my view.johnd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:30 am Anyone have any views on how thirsty the new 3l engine in the S is likely to be? Or, more specifically, is there reason to believe that there's any significant improvement in efficiency from the previous 3l?
WLTP combined for the new 3l seems to be quoted at around 33mpg. Let's say WLTP is likely still to be 20% too optimistic which might give an overall real-world average of say 26mpg (or maybe 28mpg indicated). Of course it depends on journey length, driving style etc etc yawn etc.
But for someone without too heavy a right foot and a mix of longer and shorter journeys, what the the prospects of achieving 25+ mpg real-world? Tricky to answer I know, but opinions welcome.
Simon
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
- Wing Commander
- Posts: 19922
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
I owned a 2017 Panamera 4 with the 3.0 engine for a year and covered 17,000 miles in it.pmg wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:45 am Does anyone know a recent base Panamera owner with the same basic Audi engine? Their experience and comparing the Macan and Panamera WLTP figures would give some further help on the question although 2019 engines will have added a PPF.
On my Macan S, I am hoping for 25 mpg on local trips and up to about 35 on longer motorway/ dual carriageway runs. WLTP is meant to be more accurate but Porsche has yet to put final figures for either car on the website
I achieved an indicated 28-30mpg, but the Panamera is a bigger car than the Macan, so I think your hoped-for figures are realistic, depending on how heavy your right foot is!
See my figures above for my 3.0 911 Carrera T (and I don’t generally hang about).
Simon
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
30 mpg would be game changer for me. I av that in the SD, indicated.
Macan SD Vocano Grey. LEDs, Pano Roof, PSE, Sports Chrono, PASM, Sports Design Mirrors, 21" Sports Classics in Black, lots of other extras.
http://www.porsche-code.com/PJ2XHAR5 for the day that this works again.
987 Boxster 2.7 (2006)
http://www.porsche-code.com/PJ2XHAR5 for the day that this works again.
987 Boxster 2.7 (2006)
In mixed driving I wouldn’t expect better than 27-28mpg from the new S. If WingCo is achieving 29-30 mpg on a car 600kg lighter (albeit a different engine) then I can’t see that will be replicated in a 2 tonne SUV
Current - 991.2 GTS C4 GT Silver
Previous: Macan GTS Night Blue
Previous: 981 Cayman S Agate
Previous: Macan GTS Night Blue
Previous: 981 Cayman S Agate
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 19 Replies
- 3517 Views
-
Last post by andywebber
-
- 64 Replies
- 8141 Views
-
Last post by Semerka
-
- 0 Replies
- 290 Views
-
Last post by Dylan63
-
- 9 Replies
- 2690 Views
-
Last post by timthetinyhorse
-
- 12 Replies
- 4809 Views
-
Last post by GTB