Jaguar E pace

The place to discuss everything else..
User avatar
Wing Commander
Posts: 19923
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Post by Wing Commander »

ScotMac wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:45 pm I was nearly going to buy one - but if it is 2.4" wider then it won't fit in my garage.

Have to just stick with my Macan :D :D :D
Wise decision! :ugeek: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Simon

Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018

User avatar
Mistertoad
Posts: 1405
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:52 am
Location: West Sussex

Post by Mistertoad »

I am pleased to see Jaguar have replaced the rising/ rotating gear selector with a gear lever, but I am not keen on the wheel options.

If I do revert back to one car it will be a face-lifted Macan Turbo. 8-)
2015 Cayenne S - Sold
2016 718 Boxster - Sold
2016 Bentley Continental GT V8 S
Dandock
Posts: 4096
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 7:29 pm

Post by Dandock »

Wing Commander wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:35 pm In terms of exterior dimensions the E Pace is about 11" shorter than a Macan, 2.4" wider and 1" taller. :ugeek:

This thing is at 1984mm stupidly wide and just 14mm (half an inch 😱) less than a Bentley Bentayga. An inch wider than a Cayenne! It's a bullfrog that won't fit in the garage! I'm sure it'll be a huge hit but the school run parkers aren't particularly considerate at the best of times so this will just add to the fun and games.

As the space is in the width surely the legroom and boot space are compromised. And neither is it that quick - most are in the high 7s or mid 8s - unless you pay top wack and then you're in moderately specced Macan territory.
VG Petrol S http://www.porsche-code.com/PHIVCQU7           And a GT3 RS... by Lego! Not crash-tested! 😀
User avatar
Wing Commander
Posts: 19923
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Post by Wing Commander »

Mistertoad wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:36 pm I am pleased to see Jaguar have replaced the rising/ rotating gear selector with a gear lever, but I am not keen on the wheel options.

If I do revert back to one car it will be a face-lifted Macan Turbo. 8-)

Or a Panamera Coupe/928...?! ;)
Simon

Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
User avatar
Wing Commander
Posts: 19923
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Post by Wing Commander »

Dandock wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:48 pm
Wing Commander wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:35 pm In terms of exterior dimensions the E Pace is about 11" shorter than a Macan, 2.4" wider and 1" taller. :ugeek:

This thing is at 1984mm stupidly wide and just 14mm (half an inch 😱) less than a Bentley Bentayga. An inch wider than a Cayenne! It's a bullfrog that won't fit in the garage! I'm sure it'll be a huge hit but the school run parkers aren't particularly considerate at the best of times so this will just add to the fun and games.

As the space is in the width surely the legroom and boot space are compromised. And neither is it that quick - most are in the high 7s or mid 8s - unless you pay top wack and then you're in moderately specced Macan territory.

Mike, I think that Jaguar are not primarily aiming at the potential Macan buyer with this car. The bulk of sales will be at a price point below the cheapest Macan, for those who like the looks and the Jag badge, and who are less concerned about sporty performance and handling. :geek:
Simon

Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
microbe
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:15 pm
Location: Mid Sussex

Post by microbe »

It looks OK in the pictures but the sizing is all wrong. I initially struggled with the Macan but this is too wide
Porsche Macan S - www.porsche-code.com/PHH2H4S9
Dandock
Posts: 4096
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 7:29 pm

Post by Dandock »

Wing Commander wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:55 pm
Dandock wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:48 pm
Wing Commander wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:35 pm In terms of exterior dimensions the E Pace is about 11" shorter than a Macan, 2.4" wider and 1" taller. :ugeek:

This thing is at 1984mm stupidly wide and just 14mm (half an inch 😱) less than a Bentley Bentayga. An inch wider than a Cayenne! It's a bullfrog that won't fit in the garage! I'm sure it'll be a huge hit but the school run parkers aren't particularly considerate at the best of times so this will just add to the fun and games.

As the space is in the width surely the legroom and boot space are compromised. And neither is it that quick - most are in the high 7s or mid 8s - unless you pay top wack and then you're in moderately specced Macan territory.

Mike, I think that Jaguar are not primarily aiming at the potential Macan buyer with this car. The bulk of sales will be at a price point below the cheapest Macan, for those who like the looks and the Jag badge, and who are less concerned about sporty performance and handling. :geek:
As a serious Macan competitor, I agree, particularly at the bottom to mid end. However if Jaguar believe that performance and handling are no longer important to their target then I think they've lost their way. Performance and handling is Jaguar. And they are in danger of getting into markets and volumes for which they're clearly unprepared. They're sacrificing ethos for a games of badges. And the danger there is that it threatens to compromise the status of the brand to their top end customers.
VG Petrol S http://www.porsche-code.com/PHIVCQU7           And a GT3 RS... by Lego! Not crash-tested! 😀
User avatar
Wing Commander
Posts: 19923
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Post by Wing Commander »

It will be interesting to see how the motoring journalists rate this new Jag after full road tests... :geek:

...and I guess that just because the 0-62 figures don't look that impressive, doesn't mean that overall performance, and handling, won't be top notch for the class...
Simon

Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
Dandock
Posts: 4096
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 7:29 pm

Post by Dandock »

With a track that wide relative to wheelbase it potentially could be quite sharp but I'm sure that to live up to the badge it needs some fire in its belly. I wonder what other versions they might have in mind?
VG Petrol S http://www.porsche-code.com/PHIVCQU7           And a GT3 RS... by Lego! Not crash-tested! 😀
User avatar
Wing Commander
Posts: 19923
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:43 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Post by Wing Commander »

No doubt planning to get a V6 in the engine bay at some point... 🤔
Simon

Sold: 2016 Rhodium Silver Macan 2.0
Sold: 2013 Platinum Silver 911 (991.1) C2
Sold: 2017 Carmine Red Panamera 4
Mine: 991.2 Carrera T Racing Yellow 06/04/2018
Post Reply