Dirty diesel, or NOT so dirty diesel

The place to discuss everything else..
User avatar
Paul
Posts: 8603
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:19 pm
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Post by Paul »

Peteski wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2017 4:38 pm
Col Lamb wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2017 11:13 am
The Company that the writer used has a very limited turnover and the source of their funding is questionable hence please do not take the results as literal.
Okay if the results are not literal, we still know how unrealistic the current Euro emissions test cycle is. It's laughable and soon to be replaced by hopefully something much closer to reality.
..although it was only ever meant to be used as a relative comparaison tool....manufacturers merely complied with the test as defined by “Europe”
1st Sapphire SD
2nd Sapphire GTS
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=4296
Current 992 S Cab
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=9845&p=196465#p196465

Deleted User 1874

Post by Deleted User 1874 »

Paul wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2017 5:24 pm
Peteski wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2017 4:38 pm
Col Lamb wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2017 11:13 am
The Company that the writer used has a very limited turnover and the source of their funding is questionable hence please do not take the results as literal.
Okay if the results are not literal, we still know how unrealistic the current Euro emissions test cycle is. It's laughable and soon to be replaced by hopefully something much closer to reality.
..although it was only ever meant to be used as a relative comparaison tool....manufacturers merely complied with the test as defined by “Europe”
Well as it says in the article, manufacturers complied with the letter of the regs rather than the spirit. As they would of course, they're not in this to save the planet!
Post Reply

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post