Page 1 of 1

EU perversity. More cc’s for surviving engines

Posted: Tue May 19, 2020 7:06 pm
by Dandock

Re: EU perversity. More cc’s for surviving engines

Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 8:15 am
by MikeM
Not surprising, this is what’s creating it
“We will have bigger catalytic converters by a factor of three to four – there will be an industrial chemical factory in the car to control emissions […] the main reason [for the displacement increase] is because it will take relative power per litre down”
Adding considerably extra complexity, weight and bulk. SUV’s and high performance cars will be first to fall. 🙄

Re: EU perversity. More cc’s for surviving engines

Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 8:49 am
by Paul
In the same way the EU introduced catalytic converters in the early ‘90s, effectively stopping lean burn technology from progressing.

Re: EU perversity. More cc’s for surviving engines

Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 1:43 pm
by Rab J
The confusion why Porsche spent money creating the 4L engine for the Boxster becomes clearer now. Pop a set of turbos on it and theres you new 911 engine maintaining power even with more exhaust cleaning gubbins attatched.

Re: EU perversity. More cc’s for surviving engines

Posted: Wed May 20, 2020 10:14 pm
by MikeM
Rab J wrote: Wed May 20, 2020 1:43 pm The confusion why Porsche spent money creating the 4L engine for the Boxster becomes clearer now. Pop a set of turbos on it and theres you new 911 engine maintaining power even with more exhaust cleaning gubbins attatched.
Just then have to find where the extra cleaning gubbins can be hung, can see the rear seats disappearing soon 😖

Re: EU perversity. More cc’s for surviving engines

Posted: Sat May 23, 2020 10:49 pm
by Pivot
Oh well, we will have to by the last flat-six model available before 2025. I am already plotting replacing my Macan S with 911.
The regulators might just force my hand... it’s hard to pretend that its not exciting 😎