UK Motoring Press Review

[Deleted User 4436]

So they don’t like it

Quite the opposite

Not how I read it. They say there are faster and cheaper options and its felling its age and the haptic buttons aren’t great. Not saying I agree with them but I would say that review was damning with faint praise

[Deleted User 4436]

American review of an s

Another review that isn’t exactly glowing with praise. I has a “been here before” vibe to it.

[mark-yorkshire]

Another US review
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2022 ... ive-review

[SAC1]

Don't like the look of this change......
"The gear selector in the middle is still a physical lever, but it has lost its leather gaiter, exposing the naked plastic."

[Deleted User 4436]

Ok, don’t understand a word but….

[SAC1]

Not a roof rail on any of these tested Macans.
Note how very dark the interior shots are without the benefit of a panoramic roof on any of them.

[MacanSman]

US Macan S review here chaps:

https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2022 ... ve-review/

[pmg]

So they don’t like it

They seem to like torque vectoring which a lot on here say is a waste of time!! Certainly, they are not keen on interior and make the point others now equal the performance which was probably not true when the original Turbo PP came out. However, they give it 4.5 out of 5 probably because cars like BMW X4M do not ride or handle anything like half as well.

[pmg]

American review of an s

Another review that isn’t exactly glowing with praise. I has a “been here before” vibe to it.

He says "S" now a sweet spot of range, again likes the ride handling above its more spacious and cheaper but steeper depreciating competitors. Certainly, though tested or Porsche supplied with an "S" with all the extras, air, torque vectoring and sports chrono plus 21 wheels

[pmg]

US Macan S review here chaps:

https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2022 ... ve-review/

and that review contains a link to a 2022 GTS test/drive

https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2022 ... ve-review/